You then commit, restore the remaining changes with git stash pop, and repeat. git stash save -keep-index preserves your staged changes and reverts the rest, so that you can test this intermediate state. If you use git add -p to split your current worktree changes into multiple commits ( Adding Partial Changes), you may want to test those commits first. The -keep-index option is useful for testing partially staged changes before you commit them. Otherwise, Git generates a default message like: WIP on master: 72e25df0 'commit subject' You can also give a comment as an argument, to be saved as the message on the commit representing the stash (e.g., git stash save "bugfix in progress"). This is useful to save compilation artifacts such as object files, normally ignored and untracked but that would be costly to recreate. Save untracked files (normally only tracked files are saved). This works the same way as the patch mode of git add.ĭo not revert changes already applied to the index. Interactively select hunks to save, rather than the complete diff between HEAD and the working tree. On the other hand, after you switch branches, you may want to remove all object files to ensure a correct new build, as the dependencies in a complex project as expressed by tools like make or ant may not handle such wholesale rearranging of files correctly. For example, often ignored files include compiled objects that are expensive to rebuild, so you donât want to remove them while cleaning up other untracked cruft that has accumulated in your working tree. There is no single git clean command that is most common, really it depends on what youâre trying to do. Skip the normal âignoreâ rules (but still obey rules given with -e). Directories that are in turn other Git repositories will not be removed unless you add -f -f (two âforceâ flags). Remove untracked directories as well as files. Report only errors, not the files removed.Īdd pattern to the âignoreâ rules in effect. Show what would be done, but remove no files. git clean will make no changes without this flag, unless you set clean.requireForce to false. It then prompts you to use the options - to continue after resolving the conflicts, skip the current commit, or abort the whole cherry pick, similar to git rebase. Take the commit list from standard input.Īs with other commands that apply patches, git cherry-pick can fail if a patch does not apply cleanly, and it uses the merge machinery in that case, recording conflicts in the index and working files in the usual way. You can use this to take the commitâs changes as a starting point for further work, or to squash the effect of several cherry picked commits into a single one. This is required to cherry pick merge commits at all, since otherwise it is not clear what set of changes should be replicated.Īpply the patch to the working tree and index, but do not commit. Only use this if that commit is publicly available if youâre cherry picking from a private branch, then this information is not useful to others.įor merge commits, compute the changeset for the new commit relative to the n th parent of the original. Some options:Įdit the commit message before committing.Īppend to the commit message a line indicating the original commit. The argument to git cherry-pick is a set of commits to apply, using the syntax described in Chapter 8. If there is an upstream feature you need that the distribution does not provide (and they use Git), you canât just merge it in, as your repository is not a clone of theirsâbut you may be able to apply the relevant commits individually by cherry-picking. Or, suppose you have your own repository for holding local changes made to your Unix distributionâs derivative of some open source project, such as Apache or OpenLDAP as modified and repackaged by Red Hat or Debian. For example, you might discover that a bug fix applied to a certain version actually needs to be applied to an earlier one as well, and merging in that direction is not desirable. Any arrangement of branches and merge discipline favors a certain flow of changes, and sometimes you need to buck that flow. As a very general rule, itâs best to avoid this in favor of factoring your work so that a commit appears in one place and is incorporated in multiple branches via merging instead, but that isnât always possible or practical. Git cherry-pick allows you to apply the changeset of a given commit as a new commit on the current branch, preserving the original author information and commit message.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |